Claude Code handles this as a draft: Scripts, main files, and the test command in the README. Do not push.
Claude Code · Unverified · code.claude.com · 16 Oct 2026
Claude Code handles this as a draft: Use a dynamic workflow to reproduce a rare failure, form competing theories, and keep only the theory that survives evidence. Do not push a fix until I say so.
Name the test you already see fail. Isolated worktrees are for the hunt, not for a push.
Read the audit of rejected theories. Keep the draft only if one theory survives evidence you can repeat.
You push and you merge. The agent stops at the surviving theory and the recipe.
These are editorial labels so you can compare playbooks. They are not measurements.
No. Status is unverified. The given source URL was checked on 16 Oct 2026. The prompt is an adaptation, not a vendor quote.
Pushing commits and merging. The agent owes a surviving theory and a recipe you can re-run, not a landed fix.
Claude's dynamic-workflows post. The given URL returned HTTP 200 on 16 Oct 2026. Prompt and stop rules are an AI Playbook Gems adaptation, not a vendor quote; unverified.
Machine-readable copy: JSON
Claude Code handles this as a draft: Scripts, main files, and the test command in the README. Do not push.
Claude Code · Unverified · code.claude.com · 16 Oct 2026
Claude Code reads a single module, writes characterization tests, then changes structure only where those tests pass.
Claude Code · Unverified · code.claude.com · 15 Oct 2026
Claude Code summarizes breaking changes for a single dependency, applies the upgrade, and runs the existing tests. Major bumps stay behind a question.
Claude Code · Unverified · code.claude.com · 12 Oct 2026