Loading the catalog…
Codex CLI handles this as a draft: Stack Overflow told OpenAI that two engineers gave Codex a development environment and a plan, and that a container plus that plan was how a small team built Stack Overflow for Agents. You still review the diff and you still ship.
The OpenAI article, dated 16 Oct 2026, says Stack Overflow for Agents began with a hypothesis and two engineers using Codex. They gave Codex a development environment and a plan. Alexandra Lato, VP of Product, is quoted: they were able to throw a container at it and say, this is our plan, help us build it.
The article says that within a few weeks they had a full-fledged product. That is Stack Overflow's account of their own team. Check the diff yourself before you treat a run as finished.
You ship. The article describes engineers working with Codex. It does not say Codex merged or deployed on its own.
These are editorial labels so you can compare playbooks. They are not measurements.
No. Status is unverified. The OpenAI article was fetched on 18 Oct 2026. The prompt is an adaptation of Stack Overflow's account, not a re-run.
The plan, the review, and the ship decision. The article's 'few weeks' figure is Stack Overflow's, about their own product.
OpenAI customer story, dated 16 Oct 2026, titled Stack Overflow for Agents triples signups with ChatGPT plugin. Fetched on 18 Oct 2026. It says two engineers gave Codex a development environment and a plan, quotes Alexandra Lato on throwing a container at Codex with the plan, and says they had a product within a few weeks. Figures about a ChatGPT plugin tripling registrations are a different part of the same article and are not this playbook. Prompt and stop rules are an AI Playbook Gems adaptation, not a vendor quote; unverified.
Machine-readable copy: JSON